arXiv (All)
open access
The Missing Minimal Pair: Stereotype Evaluation in LLMs
A common approach to measuring bias in Large Language Models is to compare the log-likelihoods of two contrastive stereotype sentences. We argue that such single-pair comparisons are often unreliable: simply rewriting the same stereotype with an alternative attribute can yield logically inconsistent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Acmite: Mitigating Gender Bias in LLMs through Concept-Guided Mutual Information#1156967
- Like humans, language models demonstrate face-to-character biases.#469009
- Polyrating: A Cost-Effective and Bias-Aware Rating System for LLM Evaluation#1327200
- Sex and gender bias in large language models: an old problem at a new scale.#1167028
- Name-Bias in Large Language Models#1357708
Record · ID 1218539
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive