eScholarship
metadata only
Misdiagnosing Anti-Jewish Animus: How the Judiciary's Approach to Anti-Zionism Risks Distorting the First Amendment, Excusing Antisemitism, and Imperiling All Civil Rights
Bigots try to be cagey. They use dog whistles that encode their animus. They make political pronouncements that, while superficially anodyne, signal which demographic groups are on their team—and which ones aren’t. Courts, though, aren’t readily tricked. Or at least they’re not supposed to be. Becau
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Judges of Character#1019389
- Race as Legal Fiction: Illegibility and Suppression in Passing and To Kill a Mockingbird#190578
- Race as Legal Fiction: Illegibility and Suppression in Passing and To Kill a Mockingbird#190108
- Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All‐White Juries#95448
- Wedding Cakes and Muslims: Religious Freedom and Politics in contemporary American legal practice#750512
Record · ID 1218589
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive