HAL (France)
open access
A Re‐Appraisal of Three Network Meta‐Analyses to Explain the Discrepancy in Findings for the Efficacy of Fluoxetine for the Treatment of Depression in Children and Adolescents
Objective To explain discrepant findings for fluoxetine's efficacy in three influential network meta‐analyses (NMAs) of treatments for pediatric depression, which led to conflicting clinical recommendations. Design Critical appraisal and re‐analysis of three published NMAs. Data Sources NMAs pu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Replicating a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis: a case study of the antidepressant-like effects of minocycline in rodents#672166
- Insights into systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Are we judgmental enough?#371404
- Comparative effectiveness of traditional Chinese non-pharmacological therapies for chemotherapy-related symptoms in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.#409063
- The Children and Adolescents Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survivor Study#1172223
- Fluoxetine as a Quit Smoking AID for Depression Prone#1093401
Record · ID 1219550
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive