PLOS
open access
CC BY 4.0
When the algorithm passes the test but fails the patient
Tens of thousands of AI diagnostic tools have been authorised for clinical diagnosis worldwide, justified primarily by benchmark accuracy (performance on a fixed, curated test dataset), a number that says little about what the tool will do at the bedside. The field rests on three flawed foundations
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- STEP: A Modular Silent Trial Engine for Operational Evaluation of Digital Pathology AI in Routine Workflow#792956
- STEP: A Modular Silent Trial Engine for Operational Evaluation of Digital Pathology AI in Routine Workflow#788952
- Continuous Accessibility Validation for Healthcare Web Applications Using AI-Driven CI/CD Integration#204151
- From algorithms to clinical execution: A cross-validated knowledge atlas of AI-enabled precision care (2015–2025).#320559
- Model generalizability considerations in development and evaluation of SaMD#1120075
Record · ID 1221445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive