PsyArXiv
metadata only
Why Testing Structural Theories Requires the Unconscious Condition
Consciousness science has traditionally proceeded by contrasting neural activity when a stimulus is consciously perceived against activity when the same stimulus is not perceived. This contrastive approach is well suited to locating neural correlates of consciousness, but it says little about why an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Testing Structural Theories Requires the Unconscious Condition#1225621
- Editorial: Standing on the Verge: Lessons and Limits from the Empirical Study of Consciousness#703472
- Perception and Cognition Are Largely Independent, but Still Affect Each Other in Systematic Ways: Arguments from Evolution and the Consciousness-Attention Dissociation#754683
- Conscious thoughts from reflex-like processes: A new experimental paradigm for consciousness research#116108
- Better methods won’t achieve consensus in consciousness science#75568
Record · ID 1221502
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive