PsyArXiv
metadata only
Same Effect, Different Magnitude: How the Choice of Pre- or Post-Treatment Standard Deviation Shapes Standardized Effect Sizes in Psychological Clinical Trials
Standardized mean differences (SMDs) are used to express treatment effects on a common metric, yet there is no consensus on whether mean differences should be standardized using the outcome standard deviation (SD) at baseline or follow-up. This study examined whether this choice systematically affec
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Same Effect, Different Magnitude: How the Choice of Pre- or Post-Treatment Standard Deviation Shapes Standardized Effect Sizes in Psychological Clinical Trials#1180038
- Same Effect, Different Magnitude: How the Choice of Pre- or Post-Treatment Standard Deviation Shapes Standardized Effect Sizes in Psychological Clinical Trials#1179158
- Sample Size Definition in Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials#895272
- Examining Validity and Reliability of the Shared Decision Making Process Survey in Adults With Depression#1339100
- Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB) Beta Study#872825
Record · ID 1221516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive