PhilArchive
open access
Axiomatic Theory of Tragic Subjecthood (ATTS): Ontological Foundation of Moral Systems
This paper presents the Axiomatic Theory of Tragic Subjecthood (ATTS) as the ontological foundation of moral systems. Unlike normative ethical theories, ATTS establishes the minimal structural conditions under which morality remains conceptually coherent. The central claim: moral existence presupposes a subject capable of irreversible loss. Where loss is impossible, the moral dimension cannot arise. The theory is built on the principle of primitive minimization. Four ontological primitives are introduced — Subject, Loss, Irreversibility, and Integrity — together with one derived concept — Responsibility, derived through axioms A1, A4, A6. From these, ten axioms (A1–A10) and seven structural principles (S1–S7) are derived. ATTS makes three central claims. First, subjecthood is defined not by intelligence but by the capacity for irreversible loss (A1). Second, responsibility cannot be fully delegated as long as the subject remains capable of loss (A7). Third, any system that eliminates the tragic dimension of choice operates on a reduced model of reality from which irreversibility and value conflict have been excluded (A6). ATTS does not prescribe moral behaviour. It delineates the structural conditions under which moral reasoning retains its meaning.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Subjecthood, Loss, and the Fragmentation of Moral Ontology: Reconstructing a Minimal Framework#245011
- The Axiom of Tragedy: Why the Elimination of Loss Severs Contact with Reality#709422
- The Criterion of Loss: Why AI Cannot Yet Be a Moral Subject#225444
- Embracing self‐defeat in normative theory#725341
- Boundary Transition and the Internal Ontology of the Theorem of Moral Field Closure. Article 13#714975
Record · ID 122400
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive