arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Human Agreement and Return Association Are Not Interchangeable Criteria
Financial NLP has a standard workflow: validate a sentiment tool against human labels, then trust it to extract market signal. This assumes the two evaluations measure the same thing. We test that assumption in a setting where both can be measured at once: a corpus of securities class actions (2002-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lie to me: Detecting Managerial Evasiveness in Earnings Calls via Conversational Audio Encoders#1083387
- The Motives for Moral Credit#764306
- 18 U.S.C. § 20 — Financial institution defined#574526
- Lewis’ Conditional Analysis of Dispositions Revisited and Revised#727732
- Dataset: improving automatic data extraction from financial statements with clustering analysis#457890
Record · ID 1227450
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive