ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Mucosal and Systemic Immunity After Viral Challenge of Healthy Volunteers Vaccinated With Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Via the Intranasal Versus Intramuscular Route
Background: Influenza (flu) is a contagious respiratory virus that makes humans sick. Usually its symptoms are mild, but they can be dangerous. Researchers want to see if one way of giving the flu vaccine is more effective than another. Objective: To compare the body s ability to fight infection when a flu vaccine is given in the nose versus the arm. Eligibility: Healthy, nonsmoking adults ages 18 55. They must be willing to stay in isolation for at least 9 days. They must not have had the flu vaccine since September 1, 2018. Design: Participants must be willing to use birth control or abstinence from visit 1 until 8 weeks after getting the flu virus. Participants will have at least 3 clinic visits over about a month. Visits may include: Medical history Physical exam Blood and urine tests Nasal samples collected Heart and lung function tests At the first visit, participants will get either: Flu vaccine as injection in an arm muscle plus salt water sprays in the nose OR flu vaccine as sprays in the nose plus salt water injection in an arm Within the next few months, participants will stay in an isolation room for at least 9 days. They will be with up to 20 participants. Those who test positive for recreational drugs will leave the study. Participants will: Repeat study tests Answer questions about flu symptoms Have the flu virus sprayed into their nose once Be monitored by a medical team Participants will have at least 2 follow-up visits and repeat study tests.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety and Immunogenicity of FluLaval™ TR and Fluarix® (Influenza Vaccines) in Young and Older Adults#201624
- Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Protective Efficacy and Safety of a Nasal Spray Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) in Adults Aged 18-59 Years Post-Vaccination#249657
- Immune Response of Intradermal and Intramuscular Preparations of Inactive Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Older Age Group.#303598
- The Objectives of This Study Are Study the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Flu-M [Inactivated Split Influenza Vaccine], vs. the Ultrix® Inactivated Split Influenza Vaccine, in Volunteers Who Are Over 60 Years Old#911312
- A Phase III Clinical Trial of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects Aged 6 to 35 Months#154716
Record · ID 1228810
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive