ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ambu®AuraGain™ Versus I-gel® in Obese Patients
The aim of this study is the randomized comparison of two laryngeal mask (Intersurgical i-gel® and Ambu®AuraGain™) in obese patients
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of I-gel and I-gel Plus in Elderly Patients#855475
- The Effect of Different Videolaryngoscopes on Intubation Success in Obese Patients#846552
- The Use of Ultrasound to Assess the Airway Anatomy Regarding Pharyngeal Seal and Its Protective Role Throw a Chemical Test for Three Supraglottic Devices (ProSeal LMA, I-gel, and I-gel Plus)#1126007
- Role of Ultrasonography in Airway Management#1340252
- BRI, BMI, and VIDAC Score Relationship in Obese Patients#909170
Record · ID 1229389
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive