ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry
The aim of the present study is to assess in a "real life" case list the outcome of three different surgical approaches for isolated aortic valve surgery in terms of surgery times, morbidity and mortality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Prospective Multicenter Pivotal Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Venus-Neo Surgical Aortic Valve#894694
- Heart Leaflet Technologies Valve Study#898495
- Clinical Investigation of the Freedom SOLO Stentless Heart Valve#967970
- European Clinical Study for the Application of Regenerative Heart Valves - ESPOIR#879066
- Indications and Outcomes of Non-Emergent Cardiac Surgery Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.#381060
Record · ID 1230386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive