ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Mapping Institutional Identities and the Production of Ethics
Background: Researchers want to learn how members of IRB committees interact with each other. They want to see how this affects the decision-making process. They want to learn how members see their role and the roles of their fellow members. They want to see if these views are actualized during meetings. To do this, researchers will sit in on IRB meetings and interview committee members. Objective: To explore the dynamics between IRB members. To explore how these dynamics affect the IRB process of decision making. Eligibility: NIH IRB staff or members Design: In Phase I, an investigator (AI) will sit in on IRB meetings for 6 months. The AI will take notes on the dynamics of the committees. The AI s will focus will be on the dialogue and the behavior of both the group and each member. The AI will also focus on the factors that form the decision-making process. The AI will audio-record the meetings to help take detailed notes. These recordings will be destroyed after 3 months. If the AI does not hear from members before the IRB meetings, the AI will assume that the member is agreeing to take part in Phase I. In Phase II, the AI will contact some members about taking part in a 60-minute interview. The interview will be semi-structured. It will be on site and in person. It will explore how the members see their role and the roles of others on the committee. Contact information will be collected only for members who take part in Phase II. Data will be de-identified. Withdrawing from the study will not affect any member s role on the IRB.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Role of Research Ethics Committees in Making Decisions About Risk#764149
- The Human Moral Archive Framework (HMAF): From Reflection to Conscience — A Data-Driven Architecture for Empirical Machine Ethics#726036
- The Distribution of Ethical Labor in the Scientific Community#761275
- Environmental and Biosafety Research Ethics Committees: Guidelines and Principles for Ethics Reviewers in the South African Context#72132
- Constitutive Heterogeneity in Ethical Inquiry: A Conditional Framework for Standing, Partial Translation, and Effective Answerability#690736
Record · ID 1231010
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive