arXiv (All)
open access
Expected Return Causes Outcome-Level Mode Collapse in Reinforcement Learning and How to Fix It with Inverse Probability Scaling
Many reinforcement learning (RL) problems admit multiple terminal solutions of comparable quality, where the goal is not to identify a single optimum but to represent a diverse set of high-quality outcomes. Nevertheless, policies trained by standard expected return maximization routinely collapse on
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reinforcement Learning with Segment Reward Feedback under Linear Function Approximation#1218006
- Non-asymptotic Convergence of Average-reward Q-learning with Options#1355274
- Non-asymptotic Convergence of Average-reward Q-learning with Options#1336021
- Statistical analysis of Inverse Entropy-regularized Reinforcement Learning#998059
- RLVR$^{2}$: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking#1049198
Record · ID 1232652
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive