arXiv (All)
open access
An LLM-Native Psychometric Instrument Reveals a Self-Report--Behavior Gap Across 25 Models
Do large language models' (LLMs') answers to self-report questionnaires predict how they behave? Prior work finds they do not, but it uses human personality inventories, so the gap could reflect borrowed human constructs rather than LLM self-report itself. We test this with a self-report instrument
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Apparent Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models are Largely a Measurement Artifact#290636
- "As a Language Model...": Chat Template Switches LLM Self-Referential Voice and Activation Steering Reproduces It#1051514
- A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs#927819
- From Prompts to Constructs: A Dual-Validity Framework for Large Language Model Research in Psychology#612795
- From Prompts to Constructs: A Dual-Validity Framework for Large Language Model Research in Psychology#611318
Record · ID 1232765
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive