arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond the Sycophancy Score: How Task, Model, and Pressure Shape LLM Yielding
Large language models (LLMs) often abandon a correct answer, or endorse a user's position, once the user pushes back. This behavior, called sycophancy, is usually reported as a single rate per model, which says little about when it happens or how a user can avoid it. We study the conditions that pro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tracing mechanisms of sycophantic agreement in language models#1130664
- Pass or Fail? Evaluating LLMs on Two Greek Examination Benchmarks#1129417
- ScopeIF: Improving Scope-Aware Precise Instruction-Following in Large Language Models via Graded Reward Modeling#1116520
- Theory of Scene: Breaking the Symmetry Trap in Multi-Agent LLM Coordination#1117651
- Why Do LLMs Struggle in Strategic Play? Broken Links Between Observations, Beliefs, and Actions#1034730
Record · ID 1232879
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive