arXiv (All)
open access
SpecGuard: Proving a Task Is Broken Before the Agent Cheats
As autonomous coding agents get increasingly deployed, the risk that accidental or adversarially injected misspecifications in tasks lead to dangerous agent behavior is critical to address. Prior work has shown that agents given such tasks rarely flag the conflict and instead cheat, editing tests or
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SpecGuard: Proving a Task Is Broken Before the Agent Cheats#1227414
- WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses#1131836
- WitnessGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents on the Construction of Bug Witnesses#1122374
- Set-shifting Behavioral Test for Harnessed Agents#684535
- Set-shifting Behavioral Test for Harnessed Agents#682760
Record · ID 1233198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive