arXiv (All)
open access
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
Online research platforms underpin much of what science claims about people, on the assumption that a human produced each response. Generative AI threatens that assumption by letting participants delegate responses to a chatbot, yet how often they do so remains unclear because prior estimates rely o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models#199603
- Tool or Trend? Workload, Confidence, and the Conditions for Generative AI Adoption in Research Administration#425721
- Beyond the Monolithic Interface: A Research Agenda for Plural Conversational AI#1296885
- Factors Influencing Students’ Motivation to Use ChatGPT for Learning: A TAM and UGT Approach#1016089
- Evaluating Inference Compute for Generative AI: A Framework for Enterprise Workloads#1216469
Record · ID 1233318
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive