arXiv (All)
open access
Latent Performance Profiling of Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) frequently achieve impressive scores on standardized benchmarks, yet accuracy alone offers a limited view of their capabilities. Evaluating open-source LLMs on leaderboards faces persistent issues such as data contamination, a narrow task scope, and poor alignment with r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Data Strategies for Large Language Models: A Unified Perspective on the Training Lifecycle#1357336
- Rigel: Self-Distilled Score Adaptation for Image and Video Captioning Evaluation#1109090
- How to Evaluate When You Don't Know How to Evaluate? Choosing Reliable Setups for Base Language Model Benchmarking#1345008
- Negligible in Size, Significant in Effect: On Scale Vectors in Large Language Models#684469
- Negligible in Size, Significant in Effect: On Scale Vectors in Large Language Models#682694
Record · ID 1233870
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive