arXiv (All)
open access
Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users' Task Flows
The evaluation of coding agents generally strives to be as realistic as possible. In our study, we collect 4,782 agent sessions of real software engineers in JetBrains IDEs, which we call Production Sessions. Since our subject is interactive agents, we study the sessions with at least three user mes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users' Task Flows#1227411
- Software Engineering for and with GUI Agent#441869
- WindowsWorld: A Process-Centric Benchmark of Autonomous GUI Agents in Professional Cross-Application Environments#157331
- SpecForge: Recursive Self-Improvement for Coding Agents via Behavioral Specifications#1326958
- SpecForge: Recursive Self-Improvement for Coding Agents via Behavioral Specifications#1319115
Record · ID 1234001
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive