arXiv (All)
open access
How Good Is DFT for Solid-Liquid Interfaces? A Comparison With the Random-Phase Approximation for Water on Graphene
Simulations of water at solid interfaces routinely disagree on basic properties, from contact angle to friction, depending on the model used, whether an empirical force field or a density functional theory (DFT) exchange-correlation (XC) approximation. Yet no accurate computational reference has bee
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Risk-Controlled DFT Selection for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials#1354320
- Classical DFT in realistic pore geometries. Application to adsorption prediction in zeolites and flexible MOFs.#1345616
- Scaling Density Functional Theory with Gaussian Splatting#1106182
- Graphene-Electrolyte Interfaces: Electronic Properties and Applications#297556
- Learning density functionals with differentiable DFT#232863
Record · ID 1234052
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive