arXiv (All)
open access
Before They Can Solve: Predicting Post-Training Coding-Agent Performance from Base Models
How can we predict which base checkpoint is worth an expensive round of agentic post-training? End-to-end pass@$K$ tests whether successful behavior already appears in a base model's distribution, but it is a poor fit for agentic coding: many base checkpoints cannot reliably produce the well-formed
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Before They Can Solve: Predicting Post-Training Coding-Agent Performance from Base Models#1227367
- Output Embedding Centering for Stable LLM Pretraining#998074
- TRACE: Diagnosing Verifier Brittleness in Agentic Evaluation#1248958
- Model Cards for Model Reporting#964323
- What Is Lost in Post-Training? Default Collapse and the Loss of In-Context Steerability Across Diverse Perspectives#1186928
Record · ID 1234903
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive