eScholarship
metadata only
When are IP Rights Necessary? Evidence from Innovation in IP's Negative Space
The law and economics of intellectual property has long rested on a foundational, if implicit, premise: that IP law is best understood by studying how legal rules operate in actual markets for creative work. The assumption that we best understand a body of legal rules by looking at the fields they d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Future of Intellectual Property Protection Between International Law and Emerging Technologies.#1178621
- IP, Competition Law and Access to Pharmaceuticals: the Relevance of a "Market Approach" to the Exercise of IPRs, Paper prepared in the framework of the 2013 WTO-WIPO Colloquium for Teachers of Intellectual Property#1181289
- From Thought to Practice: Appropriation and Endogenous Market Structure with Imperfect Intellectual Property Rights#942226
- What a Hybrid Legal-Technical Analysis Teaches Us About Privacy Regulation: The Case of Singling Out#964789
- Law And Ethic On The Copyright Of Artificial Intelligence Works In Indonesia#1176357
Record · ID 1235081
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive