Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

dTechs EPM Ltd. v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
canadacanadiancase-lawcourt-opinioncrossevidenceexaminationintellectual-property
Decided: 2026-10-06. Docket: T-227-17. Citation: 2026 FC 1235 (CanLII). Intellectual property — Patents — Validity — Dependent claim 4 — Anticipation and obviousness — Whether the Court should reinstate its prior ruling that claim 4 is invalid — Redetermination following remittal limited to impact of new evidence — Prior invalidity ruling reinstated | Evidence — Expert evidence — Weight — New evidence on drafting — Whether the new evidence admitted on appeal affects the weight attributed to the expert’s evidence at trial — Working agreement and invoices considered — Process of videoconferences and review of drafts assessed — No impact on weight declared | Evidence — Expert evidence — Cross-examination — Federal Courts Rules, Rule 279(c) — Whether expert evidence should be excluded due to u
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1236044
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive