OSF
open access
Student Co-Construction of Evaluation Criteria for AI-Generated Responses: A Research Protocol for Developing Evaluative Judgment in Engineering Education
ai-literacyeducationengineering-educationevaluative-judgmentgenerative-artificial-intelligencehigher-education
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has created new challenges for engineering education by making it increasingly difficult to distinguish fluent outputs from reliable engineering reasoning. This paper presents a research protocol that investigates whether student co-construction of evaluati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Educating Next Generation of Engineering Technology Students#1081216
- Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting#267681
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Engineering: Past, Present and Future#422122
- Layered Reasoning and the Consensus Verification Framework: A Reflective Engineering Case Study of AI-Assisted Decision Verification#697134
- Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering#660232
Record · ID 1241492
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive