Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law
metadata only
Even a Trump Judge Agrees that "Anti-CRT" Laws are Pro-CRT
In a surprising turn of events, a federal judge recently upheld most of Oklahoma’s HB 1775, a law widely perceived as banning Critical Race Theory (CRT) in the state. However, the ruling delivered an ironic twist: Judge Charles Goodwin—a Trump appointee—clarified that the law does not prohibit teach
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Against the Sliding Scale#977846
- 42 U.S.C. § 1009 — Hearings and review#594355
- 50 U.S.C. § 2755 — Matters relating to critical decisions#599423
- 45 U.S.C. § 1105 — Judicial review#597434
- Biased Judge: Recency Effects, Cautious Convictions, and Conservative Updating in GPT-4o’s Legal Decisions#345571
Record · ID 1241602
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive