ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Thin Versus Thicker Strut Thickness Stents in Primary Percutaneous Intervention
1. To evaluate clinical safety of the device in terms of Deaths, any stroke and Myocardial Infarction up to 1 year in both study groups to prove non inferiority of biomime stent 2. To evaluate presence of Target lesion and target vessel revascularization in in both study groups prove non inferiority of biomime stent 3. To evaluate target vessel non-target lesion revasularization in both study groups prove non inferiority of biomime stent
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-eluting Stent Trial#800315
- Vessel Wall Response of the Bio-Active-stent and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Assessed By Optical Coherence Tomography#1010194
- An Evaluation of BioMime™ - Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent in a Multi- Centre Study.#1339444
- Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating#1058936
- A Randomized Trial of Early Discharge After Trans-radial Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Acute MI and Rescue-PCI#1365370
Record · ID 1243153
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive