ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Intermittent Urinary Catheters
This is an unblinded, multi-center, randomized, controlled, cross-over study assessing wheel-chair bound, male user preference and catheter characteristics of two intermittent urinary catheters. Subjects enrolled in the study will be randomized to order of catheter use. Individual participation will consist of approximately 1 week of product use. The null hypothesis to be tested is there no difference between catheters.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of a New Catheter Material for Intermittent Catheterization#859892
- Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers#827843
- Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheter in Healthy Volunteers#1198572
- Explorative Clinical Study on the Performance and Acceptance of New Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers#837977
- Evaluation of a New Catheter Coating Process for Urinary Catheters Used for Intermittent Catheterization.#1087699
Record · ID 1243528
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive