ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Muscle Stimulation in Post-stroke Patients.
Stroke is the third most common cause of disability worldwide and leads to upper limb motor disease in more than half of people affected. Recent data demonstrate that upper limb rehabilitation can be pursued using techniques such as the observation of action (Action Observation Therapy - AOT) or the stimulation of limb musculature using surface electrodes (Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation - NMES). To date, no rehabilitation studies used both the treatments (AOT-NMES) for the rehabilitation of upper limb after stroke. The goal of this clinical trial is to study the efficacy of this combined approach (AOT-NMES) in people who developed upper limb motor impairment after stroke. The main question this study aims to answer is if the rehabilitation performed using both action observation and neuromuscular stimulation has an higher efficacy than the use of AOT alone and higher than the observation of non-motor stimuli. Participants will be people with upper limb impairment after stroke and will perform 15 rehabilitation sessions (5/week, 3 weeks, 60 minutes each). Each participant will be casually included in one of following three rehabilitation groups: * Action observation associated with neuromuscular stimulation (AOT-NMES, experimental condition): they will observe upper limb movements while their arm muscles will be stimulated. After the observation phase they will try to perform the same movements with the impaired arm. * Action observation alone (AOT): subjects will observe upper limb movements and after the observation phase then they will try to execute them with the impaired arm. * Motor-neutral observation (MNO): subjects will observe non-movement videos and after the observation phase they will try to execute upper limb movements with the impaired arm. Each participant will be evaluated for motor function before and after rehabilitation treatment and researchers will compare the motion improvement between the groups to assess the efficacy of AOT-NMES
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Associative Peripheral Stimulation for Reduction of Motor Impairment During Acute Period of Stroke Recovery#917661
- Nineteen Years of Modified CIMT in a Clinical Setting, to Improve Arm and Hand Function After Stroke#1296033
- Combine Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Stroke Patients#1185260
- Hand and Arm Motor Recovery Via Non-invasive Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation After Stroke#1044594
- Robotic Rehabilitation Vs Occupational Therapy Chronic Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation#882278
Record · ID 1243589
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive