ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Extended Pouch Gastric Bypass vs One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients With BMI≥45
The classic RYGB is in most patients with a BMI ≥45 technically not feasible. Two alternatives are the Extended Pouch Gastric Bypass and the One Anastomosis gastric bypass. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial the investigators aim to establish which technique leads to more weightloss in bariatric patients with a BMI ≥45.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Treatment of Type III Obesity (BMI 40-50 kg/m2): Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.#234553
- Safety and Efficacy of Adjustable Gastric Band Operations for Patients With Body Mass Index (BMI) Between 30-40 kg/m2#994471
- The Effects of Gastric or Duodenal Nutrient Infusion on Food Intake, Obesity and Comorbidities in Obese Individuals#845491
- Efficacy and Safety of One-anastomosis Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes Remission#968616
- Comparison of Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Metabolic and Cardiovascular Indices#1231564
Record · ID 1243823
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive