ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
AMBULATE: Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS vs. Manual Compression for Multiple Femoral Venous Access Sites, 6 - 12F ID
The objective of the trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure System (VVCS) in sealing femoral venous access sites and providing reduced times to ambulation (TTA) compared with manual compression at the completion of catheter-based procedures performed through 6 - 12 Fr introducer sheaths.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Caring for the Radial Artery Post-angiogram#1140458
- Angio-seal VIP Versus Perclose ProGlide for Closure of the Femoral Artery in Peripheral Vascular Disease#834931
- FREEDOM: "Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Safety of Resuming Early Walking After Manual Compression in Patients Treated for Peripheral Artery Disease by Endovascular Technique Involving Retrograde Femoral Puncture"#1294343
- Shortening Compression Time After Radial Access for Cardiac Catheterisation#1228687
- VASC-AF Study: Vascular Closure vs Manual Compression#1140218
Record · ID 1244272
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive