ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Bioabsorbable Versus Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent (DES): a Meta-analysis
Evidence supporting use of bioabsorbable polymer drug eluting stents (BP-DES) is uncertain. Thus the investigators planned a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of BP-DES versus PP-DES in obstructive coronary artery disease.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses#1183827
- Firebird 2 Versus Excel Sirolimus-eluting Stent in Treating Real-world Patients With Coronary Artery Disease#842298
- Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents#1294747
- DUrable Polymer-based STent CHallenge of Promus Element Versus ReSolute Integrity in an All Comers Population#810632
- Drug-eluting Stents vs. Drug-coated Balloon for Preventing Recurrent In-stent Restenosis#887495
Record · ID 1245715
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive