arXiv (All)
open access
Proof-of-Use: Mitigating Tool-Call Hacking in Deep Research Agents
While reinforcement learning (RL) enhances their ability to plan and reason across retrieval steps, we identify a critical failure mode in this setting: Tool-Call Hacking. Unlike execution-based tools (e.g., code or math), whose effects are directly observable, the weak observability of causal depen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Probe-and-Resume: When and How to Evaluate Agent Execution#1356424
- How to Speculate about Uncertainty in Agentic Coding? A Draft-Model Gate Method#972210
- SWE-Bench Pro Verified: A Reliable Benchmark for Software Engineering Agents#1011199
- When Algorithmic Exploration Becomes Cheap: A Case Study of Agentic Research in EDA#1234496
- Evidence-Gated Research: Statistically Controlled Model Adoption in Adaptive Search#1157022
Record · ID 1247299
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive