arXiv (All)
open access
Can LLMs Simulate Novice Programmers' Misconceptions?
We evaluate 13 LLMs on generating, solving, simulating, and diagnosing novice programming misconceptions on code-tracing problems. While frontier models reliably perform these tasks, small models ($\le$14B) struggle with dynamic execution. Notably, code-tuned models fail during misconception simulat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Simulate Novice Programmers' Misconceptions?#1257968
- Beyond the Traceback: Using LLMs for Adaptive Explanations of Programming Errors#662088
- Beyond the Traceback: Using LLMs for Adaptive Explanations of Programming Errors#661038
- Beyond the Traceback: Using LLMs for Adaptive Explanations of Programming Errors#480126
- MUCOCO: Automated Consistency Testing of Code LLMs#924550
Record · ID 1247583
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive