arXiv (All)
open access
Controlled Acquisition and Abstention in Three-Channel Score Conflicts
When audio, video, and text disagree, accuracy alone does not show whether to acquire another source or abstain. We study these choices in a controlled three-score benchmark: a policy observes two signed scores, may request the third at a cost, and can abstain. The primary reward is mechanism-specif
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The value of and demand for diverse news sources#976255
- Endogenous ambiguity and rational miscommunication#76773
- The puzzle of competitive fairness#71491
- Grounded Checklist Partial Credit for Agent Skill Trajectories#780804
- Grounded Checklist Partial Credit for Agent Skill Trajectories#779429
Record · ID 1247735
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive