arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating Rubric Generation with Interventional Transfer
Instance-specific rubrics are common in AI benchmarks where reliable evaluation requires specific expert knowledge. This approach is difficult to scale, prompting research into the generation of rubrics with large language models (LLMs). However, even when expert rubrics are available as references,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRACE: Diagnosing Verifier Brittleness in Agentic Evaluation#1248958
- MERIT: Matching Expertise via Rubric-Informed Training for Reviewer Assignment#998239
- Judging LLM-as-a-Judge: Concerning Rubric Artifacts in LLM-based Automated Text Generation Evaluation#925325
- Judging LLM-as-a-Judge: Concerning Rubric Artifacts in LLM-based Automated Text Generation Evaluation#921089
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
Record · ID 1247736
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive