arXiv (All)
open access
Localized, unstable, and entangled: Exploring `Us vs. Them' bias in Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit us-vs.-them bias: A behavioral asymmetry in which prompts framed around an ingroup (``we''/``us'') receive systematically more positive continuations than matched prompts framed around an outgroup (``they''/``them''). Using Edge Attribution Patching (EAP), we loc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large-Language Models as a Cognitive Virus#926272
- Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models#328729
- Theory of Scene: Breaking the Symmetry Trap in Multi-Agent LLM Coordination#1117651
- Interpreting LLMs: Challenges to a Knowledge-First Approach#96534
- Principled Thoughts for Latent Recursive LLM Systems#1131001
Record · ID 1247791
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive