arXiv (All)
open access
How Hackable Is Your Speech Quality Metric? A Corrected Protocol, a Benchmark, and What Patching Buys
Speech quality predictors are increasingly used as rewards, yet no agreed measure of their hackability exists. The usual measurement has two flaws. First, the perturbation reaches the predictor through a processing chain -- here a neural codec -- that shifts the score on its own, which scoring again
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PilotTTS: A Disciplined Modular Recipe for Competitive Speech Synthesis#229534
- Audio Preprocessing Effects on Stuttering Detection: A Class-Specific Analysis#1116616
- VoxENES 2026: Benchmarking Generalization of Speech Spoofing Detectors Against LLM-Era TTS and Voice Conversion#363292
- How Robust Are Neural Audio Codecs for African Speech? A Multi-Task Benchmark and the Limits of Perceptual Quality#1154777
- The VoicePrivacy 2026 Challenge Evaluation Plan#677129
Record · ID 1247826
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive