arXiv (All)
open access
Large Language Models for Machine Translation Quality Annotation: Humans and Models Are Both Challenged
Large Language Models (LLMs) are considered to be a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to human judgment for Machine Translation (MT) evaluation. With MT evaluation spanning a large number of language pairs, domains and levels of annotation granularity, LLMs must be thoroughly evaluated a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation#819316
- Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation#809323
- TermJudge: A Document-Level Metric Judging, Not Counting, Terminology in Machine Translation Evaluation#1129621
- Evaluating LLM-as-a-Judge Beyond Score Alignment: A Psychometric Analysis of Residual Judging Difficulty#1187555
- Translation Tag Team: Formal Rules and LLMs Translate More Macros Together than Apart#440444
Record · ID 1247845
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive