arXiv (All)
open access
Clinician use of language models diverges from how the models are evaluated
Large language model (LLM) assistants are being deployed to clinicians across health systems, and judgments about their readiness rest largely on benchmark scores, most of them derived from examination questions or curated cases. A benchmark predicts performance in deployment only to the extent that
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Survey#421590
- Clinical Concept Centers in LLMs#1187143
- Evaluating large language models as agents in the clinic#328718
- K-Bench: a clinically calibrated benchmark for evaluating large language models in high-risk mental health conversations#1258013
- English is Not All You Need: Systematically Exploring the Role of Multilinguality in LLM Post-Training#1048631
Record · ID 1247996
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive