arXiv (All)
open access
Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity
Can a regulator promise both a risk ceiling and a development deadline when safety productivity is unknown? A ceiling below the final model's unprotected hazard requires a minimum stock of safety knowledge, so both promises hold only if weak research can be ruled out. Learning first and then replayi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fairness Theatre: Evaluating Post-Hoc Fairness Interventions in Vendor-Controlled Early Warning Systems#1143153
- The Variance Preservation Premium: Why Independent Sources of Novelty Can Increase Resilience Under Model Uncertainty#687756
- Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem#441790
- From model failure to system harm: operationalizing a sociotechnical pathway for healthcare AI safety.#1134588
- Mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals (MEMoRisk) — A new SETAC-Europe Advisory Group#1153919
Record · ID 1248020
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive