arXiv (All)
open access
Bayesian inference under model misspecification
The likelihood input to a Bayesian analysis almost never exactly represents how the data were generated, calling into question the validity of posterior inferences. We review a variational interpretation of the Bayesian posterior as an alternative justification for its use under model misspecificati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Joint Effects of Measurement Error and Model Misspecification on Statistical Interactions#331604
- A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials#231913
- Misspecification, Nonstationarity, and Approximate Inference in Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Neural Networks#643805
- Low Rank Based Subspace Inference for the Laplace Approximation of Bayesian Neural Networks#131285
- Bounding causal effects with an unknown mixture of informative and non-informative missingness.#446068
Record · ID 1248100
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive