arXiv (All)
open access
Who Verifies the Verifier? Co-Evolving Inspectable Graders with Self-Improving Agents
We changed the agent: did it actually get better? Every self-improving agent loop answers this hundreds of times, and every answer comes from a verifier. On open-ended tasks none exists, so the loop is handed a hand-written rubric or a bare LLM judge grading output from a model like itself, inviting
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Grading the Grader: Lessons from Evaluating an Agentic Data Analysis System#303245
- From Agent Output to Authorized Transition#1064760
- When Students Use AI: Toward Validity-Centered Assessment Design#25962
- A Triage Theory of Grading: The Good, the Bad, and the Middling#762498
- Grading Needs a Rubric, Not Intelligence#463255
Record · ID 1248744
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive