arXiv (All)
open access
SoK: Are LLMs Reliable at Source Code Recovery? A Taxonomy and Empirical Evaluation
Effective source recovery is critical to security applications such as malware analysis, vulnerability assessment, and legacy maintenance. Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping this field, shifting the paradigm away from rule-based heuristics to probabilistic and high fidelity semantic recovery
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SoK: Are LLMs Reliable at Source Code Recovery? A Taxonomy and Empirical Evaluation#1242693
- Towards Knowledge Alignment in Code LLMs: Contrastive Unlearning for Evolving APIs#324973
- Transformer-Assisted LLM-Based Source Code Summarisation: to Enable More Secure Software Development#394481
- Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systems#609283
- Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systems#459635
Record · ID 1248836
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive