arXiv (All)
open access
Re-randomization-probability weighting for population-adjusted comparisons of maintenance outcomes across trial designs
Randomized-withdrawal trials re-randomize induction responders to continued treatment or withdrawal. Baseline characteristics are often reported for the induction population but unavailable for responders, limiting population-adjusted indirect comparisons of maintenance outcomes. We describe re-rand
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Two-stage Adaptive Design Cluster Randomised Trials#785119
- Two-stage Adaptive Design Cluster Randomised Trials#783529
- Ready for the Clinic? A Survey of Open-Source Software for Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials#1130781
- Return or Revise? Learning When Revision Helps Retrieval-Augmented QA#1078158
- The impact of temporal resampling on the safety of clinical reinforcement learning: A simulated trial#1357101
Record · ID 1249498
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive