HAL (France)
open access
Risks of automation in medicine - a review article for the obstetrics case
The current overoptimism surrounding AI threatens to disrupt clinical environments. We discuss the risks related to invasive automation and describe how AI performance exaggeration may lead to clinical errors. We also investigate cognitive damage to clinicians: automation bias and de-skilling, by ex
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI#30017
- High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI#14457
- High-Risk Without Safeguards? The EU AI Act and the Deregulation of Medical AI#14456
- Usages and perceptions of artificial intelligence among French radiologists#138332
- Usages and perceptions of artificial intelligence among French radiologists#134324
Record · ID 1250844
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive