CanLII
metadata only
D.V. v. Cordocedo
Decided: 2026-10-05. Docket: COA-25-CV-0223. Citation: 2026 ONCA 705 (CanLII). Procedure — Persons under disability — Settlement approval motion — Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 7.08 — Did the motion judge err by failing to initialize and redact the record? — Open court principle applies to r. 7.08 motions, S.E.C. v. M.P. — Alternative relief not addressed below considered afresh — Appeal allowed in part | Procedure — Court openness — Confidentiality orders — Courts of Justice Act, ss. 135, 137 — Whether initializations and redactions are justified despite the presumption of openness — Sherman Estate v. Donovan criteria applied — Serious risk to important public interest in protecting a child’s identity found — Redactions ordered, sealing order not pursued — Appeal allowed in part | Procedur
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Musick#1368062
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- Newton v. Grillo#1053797
- Nolan & Ors v Office of the Legal Cost Adjudicators of the High Court [2026] IEHC 337 (13 May 2026)#267787
- Oyekunle Oyelakin v. Clerk of the Philadelphia Family Court#1169519
Record · ID 1251753
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive