Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

D.V. v. Cordocedo

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
canadacanadiancase-lawcomplexityconfidentialityprocedureprofessional-responsibilitytime
Decided: 2026-10-05. Docket: COA-25-CV-0223. Citation: 2026 ONCA 705 (CanLII). Procedure — Persons under disability — Settlement approval motion — Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 7.08 — Did the motion judge err by failing to initialize and redact the record? — Open court principle applies to r. 7.08 motions, S.E.C. v. M.P. — Alternative relief not addressed below considered afresh — Appeal allowed in part | Procedure — Court openness — Confidentiality orders — Courts of Justice Act, ss. 135, 137 — Whether initializations and redactions are justified despite the presumption of openness — Sherman Estate v. Donovan criteria applied — Serious risk to important public interest in protecting a child’s identity found — Redactions ordered, sealing order not pursued — Appeal allowed in part | Procedur
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1251753
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive