ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency
This study investigates the effectiveness of two treatments-genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency-in reducing pain and improving function in osteoarthritis patients. These techniques, used after diagnostic nerve blocks, aim to provide long-lasting pain relief. Despite both being found effective, no clear consensus exists on which method is superior. The study seeks to compare these techniques and contribute new insights to the existing literature.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves on Postural Stability in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis#802997
- Pain Managment in Chronic Shoulder Pain#1046113
- Effectiveness Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI) in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain#1296109
- Opioid Taper Study#1339182
- The Efficacy of Suprascapular Nerve Radiofrequency and Intra-articular Steroid Injection in Frozen Shoulder Treatment#1150772
Record · ID 1260570
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive