ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Sinus Lift With Hydroxyapatite Nano Particles Versus Tenting Technique
twenty recruited patients indicated for sinus augmentation and immediate implant placement will be divided into two groups (10 in each of the two groups), to compare bone formation and implant stability after shneiderian membrane elevation and augmentation with Hydroxyapatite Nano particles \[Nanostreams\] or augmentation with graft less tenting technique with simultaneous implant placement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft#803192
- Radiographic Assessment of Deproteinized Porcine Versus Bovine Bone Mineral in Sinus Augmentation#836949
- Titanium Mesh Coated With Natural Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals in Orbital Reconstruction#875370
- Soft Tissue Response to Peek and Ti Healing Abutments#1370036
- Predictors For Transosseous Maxillary Sinus Lift Complications#854557
Record · ID 1260780
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive