ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Vital Primary Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare treatment outcomes between pulpotomy and pulpectomy when used to treat vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Compared to the standard pulpectomy treatment, pulpotomy is a technically simpler procedure, less time consuming, easier for young patients to tolerate, while retaining the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth - all important advantages when treating young children.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pulpotomy in Vital Primary Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis#994536
- Outcome of Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in Reversible Pulpitis#1293731
- Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy Using Neoputty Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Versus Pulpectomy Using Endoflas In Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial#865134
- Vital Pulp Therapy to Treat Irreversible Pulpitis#1352393
- Outcomes of Pulpotomy and Root Canal Treatment in Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis#1140607
Record · ID 1261160
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive