ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Surgeries With Lateral Position Under General Anesthesia
To compare the efficacy and safety of traditional inflatable laryngeal mask, i-gel non-inflatable laryngeal mask and GMA-TULIP non-inflatable laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position under general anesthesia, so that providing evidence for the selection of laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Laparoscopic Surgeries With Trendelenburg Position Under General Anesthesia#837018
- The Effect of Paratracheal Pressure on the Glottic View#846832
- Laryngeal View With Videolaryngoscopy#1059039
- Comparison of Gastric Insufflation With the Classic Igel Laryngeal Mask and the New Igelplus Laryngeal Mask Using Gastric Ultrasound#806691
- LMA Protector vs I-Gel in Low-Flow Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1085344
Record · ID 1261297
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive